Carol Rovane is Professor of Philosophy at Columbia University, where she has served as Director of Graduate Studies and Chair of the Philosophy Department, and was recently awarded the Lenfest Distinguished Faculty Award. She publishes widely in the areas of metaphysics, philosophy of mind, philosophy of action and ethics, and has authored two books: The Bounds of Agency: An Essay in Revisionary Metaphysics, and The Metaphysics and Ethics of Relativism. An abiding theme of her work concerns the very idea and nature of a point of view. Every form of subjectivity requires some notion of a subjective point of view. But this is not just one thing. For example, the bodily point of view from which we perceive and move is not necessarily the same thing as the phenomenological point of view from which there is something it is like to feel our sensations, or the rational point of view from which we deliberate and act and regard ourselves as possessing freedom. No matter how we conceive a point of view, there are serious and puzzling issues concerning how to construe the subjective in relation to the objective, as well as subjects in relation to one another — or in other words, mind-world relations and mind-mind relations.
Carol Rovane
Professor of Philosophy, Columbia University
Participant In These Roundtable Discussions
Thu
Jan 1st
2015
Jan 1st
2015
Watch
Science and the Big Questions: Roundtable Series on the Physical and Spiritual World, the Brain-Mind Connection, and Human Development and Genetics
This series of fourteen roundtables will explore fundamental questions across the sciences and humanities, including knowledge and its limits, infinity, complexity and emergence, consciousness, memory, free will, genius, development, and the nature of human experience.
Sat
Oct 24th
2015
Oct 24th
2015
Watch
The Realm of Mystery
This roundtable will examine the philosophical problem of knowledge and ignorance, considering how we come to recognize the limits of what we know and how “known unknowns” and “unknown unknowns” can be progressively identified through inquiry, reflection, and dialogue.
Sat
May 12th
2018
May 12th
2018
Watch
The Completeness of Physics
This roundtable examines whether science’s empirical success implies a universal account of reality, or whether reality is better understood as consisting of multiple ontological levels and a plurality of scientific frameworks. It considers tensions between reductionist and pluralist views, and reflects on the implications of these positions for the status of the humanities, the possibility of a unified theory of reality, and the limits of human cognition in grasping such unity.